• Ratiolex represented a UAE subsidiary of a Finnish consulting and engineering company in a dispute conducted in English concerning a consulting agreement against a client from the UAE, in which the applicable law is UAE law and the provisions of FIDIC, 4/2026-9/2026: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client after our client’s opponent party paid our client a notable amicable compensation amount.
• Ratiolex represented a Finnish construction company as a claimant in a contract dispute relating to the General Conditions for Building Contracts (YSE 1998) in the District Court of Itä-Uusimaa, 2/2024-9/2026: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client after our client’s opponent party paid the principal amounts of our client’s claims totaling hundreds of thousands of euros in full.
• Ratiolex represents a Finnish subsidiary of a foreign group of companies in a case concerning an objection against a decision of a shareholders’ meeting before the Supreme Court which granted leave to appeal to our client, 8/2026-.
• Ratiolex represents one of the world’s leading record and music industry companies in a risk assessment of the international agreement framework model, 8/2026-.
• Ratiolex advised a Chinese pharmaceutical company on a corporate enforcement matter related to Finland, 6/2026–8/2026.
• Ratiolex represented a real estate service company as a claimant in a dispute concerning renovation works at the District Court of Länsi-Uusimaa, 9/2025-8/2026: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.
• Ratiolex’s partner served as the sole arbitrator appointed jointly by the parties in arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration Rules of the Finland Chamber of Commerce (FAI) concerning a product supply agreement in the agricultural sector, 9/2025-7/2026.
• Ratiolex advises a state in multi-billion Euros investment arbitration proceedings before a five-member arbitral tribunal initiated by energy companies relating to investment protection agreements, 6/2026-.
• Ratiolex advised the sellers in an M&A arrangement concerning a share purchase and a shareholders’ agreement, in which the purchaser was a Swedish listed company, 6/2026.
• Ratiolex successfully advised a state in the court proceedings in Norway in which a consortium of creditors sought to enforce 5 billion US dollars arbitral award based on the ECT Agreement against four properties located in Svalbard. The Norwegian court ruled in favor of the state and ordered the creditors’ consortium to pay the state’s legal costs, 2/2026–5/2026.
• Ratiolex represents a Swiss company as a claimant in a consultancy agreement dispute against Finnish shareholders in arbitration proceedings in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the Finland Chamber of Commerce (FAI) before a sole arbitrator, with Finnish law as the applicable law and Helsinki, Finland, as the seat of arbitration, 5/2026-.
• Ratiolex represents a doctor and a medical company as claimants in a shareholders’ agreement dispute against another medical company and its shareholders in the District Court of Pirkanmaa, 5/2026-.
• Ratiolex successfully represented a Finnish transportation company as the respondent in a dispute concerning a subcontracting agreement before the District Court of Itä-Uusimaa, 3/2025–4/2026: the District Court’s judgment of 14 April 2026 whereby our client’s opponent party’s claims were dismissed in their entirety and the opponent party was ordered to pay our client’s legal costs.
• Ratiolex advises a state in billion Euros investment protection treaty related legal proceedings in Romania, 4/2026-.
• Ratiolex successfully represented a Finnish company providing ICT and telecommunications operator services as the claimant in arbitration proceedings conducted in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the Finland Chamber of Commerce concerning a breach of a shareholder agreement’s non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality clauses and liquidated damages, 10/2025-3/2026: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client after our client’s opponent parties paid our client an amicable compensation of hundreds of thousands Euros.
• Ratiolex represents a Latvian bio-oil company as a claimant and a respondent of a counterclaim in a MEUR 40 dispute concerning a service agreement against a Russian-owned Finnish oil company. The dispute is conducted in accordance with the SCC Arbitration Rules in English before a three-member arbitral tribunal, with Latvian law as the applicable law and Stockholm, Sweden, as the seat of arbitration 1/2026-.
• Ratiolex represents a Latvian bio-oil company as a claimant in the District Court of Helsinki in a MEUR 3.4 dispute concerning a bio-oil supply contract against a Russian-owned Finnish oil company wherein the applicable laws are the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) and Latvian law, 1/2026-.
• Ratiolex successfully represented a Finnish construction company as the applicant in proceedings for the enforcement of an arbitral award rendered in the ad hoc arbitration proceedings under the Finnish Arbitration Act and related precautionary measures at the District Court of Helsinki, 8/2025-1/2026.