{"id":4487,"date":"2019-05-17T06:04:43","date_gmt":"2019-05-17T03:04:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/referenssi\/2016\/"},"modified":"2019-05-17T06:04:43","modified_gmt":"2019-05-17T03:04:43","slug":"2016","status":"publish","type":"referenssi","link":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2016\/","title":{"rendered":"2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a bankruptcy estate as a claimant in recovery proceedings against a listed bank in the District Court of Vantaa, 4\/2016-12\/2016: the judgment on 20 December 2016, whereby our client&#8217;s recovery claims were accepted and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent party in full.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a bankruptcy estate in recovery proceedings, 9\/2016-12\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish reuse company in an employment wages dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 3\/2016-12\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client on 13 December 2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a Finnish construction company in a contract dispute relating to the General Conditions for Building Contracts (YSE 1998) in the District Court of Vantaa, 12\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented an international oil business corporation&#8217;s Finnish subsidiary as a respondent in a contract dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 7\/2016-12\/2016: the decision on 7 December 2016, whereby all our client&#8217;s opponent party&#8217;s claims were dismissed and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent party.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised one of the leading international freight forwarding and logistics company in contract and corporate matters, 11\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented one of the world&#8217;s leading record and music industry companies as a respondent in a contract dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 6\/2015-11\/2016: the judgment on 22 November 2016, whereby all our client&#8217;s rebuttals were accepted in full and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent party.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a Finnish telecommunication company as a plaintiff in a criminal procedure regarding infringement and misuse of trade secrets related damage claims in the District Court of Espoo, 11\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a bankruptcy estate as a claimant in insolvency related precautionary measures proceedings and the directors&#8217; liabilities, damages and recovery proceeding related dispute in the District Court of Espoo, 11\/2014-11\/2016: whereby the opponent parties were obliged to pay 0.25 MEUR to our client added with the interests and legal costs of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a purchaser in joint-stock property company&#8217;s M&amp;A dispute, 6\/2016-11\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish transportation limited liability company as a claimant in a cross-border transportation service dispute in the District Court of Hyvink\u00e4\u00e4, 4\/2016-11\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advises an international franchising business company in drafting franchising agreements related to Finland, 11\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a Finnish oil business company in economic sanctions related contractual issues, 11\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents an employer limited liability company as a respondent in an employment termination dispute in the District Court of Pohjois-Savo, 10\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a Finnish construction limited liability company in a contract dispute relating to the General Conditions for Building Contracts (YSE 1998), 10\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents an employer limited liability company in an employment termination dispute, 10\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a media company in drafting a co-operation agreements, 10\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advises a buyer in an industrial real estate transaction, 10\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised an international franchising business company in a franchising agreement dispute, 12\/2015-10\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a bankrupt&#8217;s estate as a claimant in an insolvency related precautionary measures proceedings and director&#8217;s liability dispute in the District Court of Vantaa, 9\/2016-10\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented developers as the claimants in a construction dispute in the District Court of Helsinki wherein the respondents were two contractors and construct consultant, 8\/2015-9\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our clients.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents claimant in a liability for maintenance and damages dispute against a housing company in the District Court of Helsinki, 9\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a bankruptcy trustee regarding the bankruptcy of a Finnish swimming school limited liability company, 10\/2014-9\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acts as a bankruptcy trustee regarding a bankruptcy of construction limited liability company, 9\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish construction company in a contract dispute relating to the General Conditions for Building Contracts (YSE 1998), 4\/2016-9\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a travel industry company in a service contract dispute in the District Court of Varsinais-Suomi, 9\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish contraction company in drafting a subcontract agreement, 9\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish design company in drafting a co-operation agreement with a Swedish company, 9\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish construction company in a contract dispute relating to the General Conditions for Building Contracts (YSE 1998), 6\/2016-9\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a bankruptcy trustee regarding the bankruptcy of the pay TV company, 6\/2015-8\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in drafting convertible and credit limit loan agreements with Estonian companies, 8\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of a Finnish limited liability company in an M&amp;A arrangement relating to the share purchase of a Russian company, 8\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised one of the leading international freight forwarding and logistics company in an international contractual arrangement with a Finnish listed company, 8\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish commercial aircraft operator company in a contractual arrangement with a Finnish listed company and a Finnish Sport Club, 8\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised an international franchising business company in drafting agreements, 8\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a bankruptcy trustee regarding a bankruptcy of a vehicles&#8217; maintenance work company, 9\/2015-8\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a transportation company as a respondent in a criminal procedure relating to overworks in the District Court of Vantaa, 8\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a German transportation company in a transportation agreement dispute against a Finnish company, 5\/2016-7\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acts as a bankruptcy trustee regarding a bankruptcy of technology business limited liability company, 7\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised an international aviation business company in its business structuring arrangements, 6\/2016-7\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a cleaning branch limited liability company in a safety at work criminal trial in the District Court of Pohjanmaa, 7\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented the appellants&#8217; opponent party in an agreement dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 2\/2015-6\/2016: the judgment on 30 June 2016, whereby our client&#8217;s rebuttal claims were accepted and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent party.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish construction company in an employment termination and employment wages dispute in the District Court of Keski-Suomi, 4\/2016-6\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client on 30 June 2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented the sellers as respondents and counterclaimants in an M&amp;A dispute in the District Court of It\u00e4-Uusimaa, 10\/2014-6\/2016: the judgment on 16 June 2016, whereby our clients&#8217; opponent party&#8217;s all claims were dismissed and the legal costs of our clients shall be paid by the opponent party.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a real estate agency office as a claimant in a commission dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 7\/2014-6\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acts as a bankruptcy trustee regarding the bankruptcy of motor vehicles&#8217; supply and garage business limited liability company, 6\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented the appellants&#8217; opponent party in an agreement dispute in the Turku Court of Appeals, 5\/2015-6\/2016: the judgment on 9 June 2016, whereby our client&#8217;s rebuttal claims were accepted and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent parties.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of the shareholders of a Finnish janitorial service company in an M&amp;A arrangement regarding a share purchase, 4\/2016-6\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a housing company in a consultancy&#8217;s liability matter relating to the General conditions for consulting KSE 1995, 12\/2015-5\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of the shareholders of a Finnish dental business company in an M&amp;A arrangement regarding a share purchase of millions euros, 2\/2016-5\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of a Finnish limited liability company in executing a share issue, 4\/2016-5\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised one of the world&#8217;s leading manufacturers of glass and glazing systems in a sale transaction of an industrial real estate site of millions euros, 4\/2016-5\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advises a Finnish limited liability company in drafting a subcontract with an Azerbaijani company, 4\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a developer as a respondent in a building contract dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 4\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a Finnish construction company in an IT-service contract dispute in the District Court of Varsinais-Suomi, 4\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a Finnish property maintenance company in an M&#038;A agreement dispute in the District Court Pirkanmaa, 4\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a storage company in employment disputes in the District Court of Helsinki, 4\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish accountant limited liability company as a respondent in an employment wages dispute in the District Court of L\u00e4nsi-Uusimaa 9\/2015-4\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish limited liability company as a respondent in an employment termination and employment wages dispute in the District Court of Varsinais-Suomi 9\/2015-4\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish transportation limited liability company as a claimant in a transportation agreement dispute in the District Court of Hyvink\u00e4\u00e4, 3\/2016-4\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Swiss and a Finnish company in an international financing agreement dispute under English applicable law, 1\/2016-4\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our clients.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advises a Finnish limited liability company in drafting a letter of intent agreement relating to a joint venture arrangement with a Russian company, 4\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in drafting the agreements relating to the shares&#8217; call options, 4\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a bankruptcy estate in a recovery proceedings in the District Court of Helsinki, 1\/2016-4\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a maintenance work company of the aircrafts in drafting a co-operation agreement relating to the matters of a Nordic travel agency company&#8217;s aircraft, 3\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised an international aviation business company in a managing director agreement dispute, 9\/2015-3\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a Finnish construction limited liability company as a respondent in an employment termination and employment wages dispute in the District Court of L\u00e4nsi-Uusimaa 10\/2014-3\/2016: judgment on 15 March 2016, whereby our client&#8217;s rebuttal claims were mainly accepted and the legal costs of our client shall be mainly paid by the opponent party.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents three Finnish construction companies in a construction contract dispute, 3\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a Finnish foundation in a housing company law related liability issues, 3\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of a Finnish limited liability company in its shareholders&#8217; general meeting, 3\/2015.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a Finnish marketing event limited liability company as a claimant and as a respondent of a counterclaim in an M&amp;A preliminary agreement dispute in arbitration proceedings governed by the Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Finland Chamber of Commerce (FAI), 7\/2015-3\/2016: the arbitral award rendered on 3 March 2016 whereby our client&#8217;s claims succeeded mainly and response to the counterclaim succeeded in full.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a bankruptcy estate in a recovery proceedings in the District Court of Helsinki, 1\/2016-3\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish maintenance work company of helicopters and aircraft in a cross-border compliance report, 12\/2015-2\/2015.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish transportation limited liability company as a respondent in an employment wages due dispute in the District Court of Vantaa, 2\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised an American artist in performer agreement negotiations and international tax related issues, 12\/2015-2\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in an international arrangement of 3 MEUR capital loan and in executing its corporate resolutions, 2\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish gold- and silversmith company chain in drafting a subcontract agreement, 2\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a cleaning branch company as a respondent in an employment termination dispute in the District Court of Vantaa, 1\/2016-2\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a bankruptcy trustee regarding the bankruptcy of the IT sales and importer limited liability company, 11\/2015-2\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish clothing import and wholesale limited liability company in drafting an agency agreement with a German company, 2\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a bankruptcy trustee regarding the bankruptcy of a Finnish janitorial service limited liability company, 4\/2014-2\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a Russian majority shareholder of the large international corporation in a compliance procedure relating to Finland, 2\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a bankruptcy estate in a recovery proceedings in the District Court of Helsinki, 1\/2016-2\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish company in a claim for rent against an Austrian company, 11\/2015-2\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a housing company as a respondent in a compensation for damages in the District Court of Helsinki, 1\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a Finnish construction limited liability company in a contract dispute relating to the General Conditions for Building Contracts (YSE 1998) in the District Court of Vantaa, 1\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a Finnish transportation company in an employment dispute in the District Court of Vantaa, 1\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represents a Finnish construction limited liability company in a service contract dispute in the District Court of Espoo, 1\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represent a Swiss company in service agreement dispute, 1\/2016-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advises one of the leading international freight forwarding and logistics company in company law related issues, 1\/2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a builder housing company as a claimant in consultancy&#8217;s liability dispute relating to the General conditions for consulting KSE 1995 in the District Court of Espoo, 4\/2015-1\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish commercial aircraft operator company in an aircraft management agreement dispute with a company from the British Virgin Islands, 9\/2015-1\/2016: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"class_list":["post-4487","referenssi","type-referenssi","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/referenssi\/4487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/referenssi"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/referenssi"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}