\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish carrier limited liability company in a transportation agreement dispute with an Italian carrier company, 9\/2011-12\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client on 21 December 2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised three Finnish limited liability companies in their reorganization arrangement, 12\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish distributor and importer limited liability company in drafting a distribution agreement with a Danish company, 12\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised one of the leading international chemical industry companies in drafting a subcontract agreement, 11\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in a company law related disagreements and its shareholders’ in redemption of the shares, 8\/2011-11\/2011: the matters were closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our clients.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented an employee in an employment dispute, 10\/2010-11\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in financing and share issuing arrangements, 11\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised Finnish shareholders of the international company in a corporate resolution and shareholder’s agreement related execution issues, 11\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised one of a leading international freight forwarding and logistics limited liability company in drafting the lease agreements, 10\/2011-11\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a housing corporation as a respondent in a housing corporation related dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 5\/2011-11\/2011: the judgment on 1 November 2011, whereby our client’s claims succeed and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent party in full.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish IT-business limited liability company in contractual negotiations with a Swiss and a Norwegian public listed companies, 10\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented an employer limited liability company in an employment termination dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 5\/2011-10\/2011: the District Court confirmed the parties’ settlement on 31 October 2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Representing a contractor limited liability company in a building contract disagreement relating to the General Conditions for Building Contracts (YSE 1998) 10\/2011-.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a contractor limited liability company in a building contract dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 10\/2010-10\/2011: the judgment on 27 October 2011, whereby our client’s claims succeed and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent company in full.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented an employee as a claimant in employment dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 8\/2010-10\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client on 25 October 2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish limited liability company as a claimant in a co-operation dispute in the District Court of Vantaa, 5\/2011-10\/2011: the District Court confirmed the parties’ settlement on 21 October 2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Representing a limited liability company in an employment termination dispute, 10\/2011-.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a claimant in employment dispute in the District Court of Hyvink\u00e4\u00e4, 4\/2011-10\/2011: the judgment on 17 October 2011, whereby our client’s claims succeed mainly and the legal costs of our client shall mostly be paid by the opponent company.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Representing the shareholders and their holding company in a corporate resolution and financing agreement related company law issues, 10\/2011-.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in a redemption of shares under a shareholders’ and financing agreement and company law related disagreement issue, 10\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a claimant in service agreement reimbursement dispute in the District Court of Helsinki wherein our client’s opponent party was a listed German public company, 6\/2010-10\/2011: the judgment on 6 October 2011, whereby our client’s claim was accepted and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent party in full.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised an international franchising business company in drafting franchising agreements related to Finland, 10\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented claimants in a real estate business dispute in the District Court of Tuusula, 11\/2010-9\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client on 26 September 2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish distributor and importer limited liability company in drafting a distribution agreement with an U.S. company, 9\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish IT-business limited liability company in drafting a shareholders’ agreement, 9\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in drafting a co-operation agreement, 9\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish limited liability company as a claimant in a compensation matter regarding the infringement of the confidentiality and non-competition obligations of an employment agreement, 11\/2010-9\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client on 6 September 2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Representing a Finnish limited liability company as a respondent in an M&A dispute in the District Court of Etel\u00e4-Pohjanmaa, 9\/2011-.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Representing a Finnish limited liability company as a claimant in a service agreement dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 9\/2011-.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of a Finnish limited liability company at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting, in drafting a shareholders’ agreement, in providing the decision to increase share capital on the basis of a share capital investment at the meetings of the board of directors and in planning an amendments to the article of associations, 8\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a car dealer limited liability company as a respondent in a civil dispute regarding sale of goods in the District Court of Tuusula, 3\/2011-8\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client on 25 August 2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Representing an employer limited liability company in an employment termination dispute in the District Court of Hyvink\u00e4\u00e4, 8\/2011-.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Representing an employer limited liability company in an employment termination dispute in the District Court of It\u00e4-Uusimaa, 8\/2011-.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish import and wholesale limited liability company in contractual arrangement regarding the international distribution agreement, 8\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised one of the leading international chemical industry companies in an employment matter regarding the infringement of the trade secrets and non-competition obligations, 8\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in an M&A arrangement regarding sale of one of the leading international real estate agency company’s Finnish branch, 6\/2011-8\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex succesfully represented a seller in a real estate business dispute, 4\/2011-7\/2011: our client’s opponent party withdrew its claims.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Representing a Finnish import and wholesale limited liability company in a dealer agreement dispute, 7\/2011-.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish freight forwarding and logistics limited liability company in an insolvency related matter, 7\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish carrier limited liability company as a respondent in an employment termination dispute in the District Court of Vantaa, 2\/2011-6\/2011: the District Court confirmed the parties’ settlement on 27 June 2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish retail trade limited liability company in drafting a framework supply agreement, 6\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented an employer limited liability company as a respondent in employment dispute in the District Court of Espoo, 4\/2010-6\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client on 13 June 2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a leading international freight forwarding and logistics limited liability company in drafting an addendum side letter warehousing agreement, 6\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of a Finnish health care business limited liability company in drafting share purchase agreements, 6\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a leading international freight forwarding and logistics limited liability company in drafting a sea and air freight frame agreement, 5\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in drafting a shareholders’ agreement and in directed share issue arrangements, 5\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented an electricity contractor limited liability company in a contractor agreement dispute, 4\/2011-5\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our client.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a buyer in a dispute regarding a real estate business trade, 3\/2011-5\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our client.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in drafting a non-disclosure agreement, 5\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in drafting a co-operation agreement, 5\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Representing an employer limited liability company in an employment termination dispute, 5\/2011-.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a claimant in an international ad hoc arbitration under the Finnish Arbitration Act in a dispute concerning the employment termination and which was conducted in English, 3\/2010-5\/2011: the arbitral tribunal rendered its arbitral award on 13 May 2011 whereby our client’s claims succeed mainly and the legal costs of our client shall mostly be paid by the opponent company.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish limited liability company as a principal in an international agent agreement dispute, 4\/2011-5\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our client.<\/p>\n
\u2022 A limited-liability company represented by Ratiolex was granted leave to
\nappeal (VL:2011-51) by the Supreme Court of Finland in a dispute concerning insolvency law, 5\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a Finnish import and wholesale limited liability company in an insolvency related dispute in the District court of Pohjois-Savo, 1\/2011-4\/2011: the judgment on 20 April 2011, whereby our client’s claims succeed and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent party.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in drafting a shareholders’ agreement, 4\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a claimant Finnish limited liability company in a contractual dispute regarding renovation works in the District Court of Helsinki, 1\/2011-4\/2011: the District Court of Helsinki confirmed a settlement on 5 April 2011 whereby the opponent party undertook to pay all our client’s claims on the merits.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a builder housing corporation as appellant’s opponent party in a building contract disagreement relating to the General Conditions for Building Contracts (YSE 1998) in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 7\/2010-4\/2011: the Helsinki Court of Appeals confirmed the settlement on 22 March 2011 in favour of our client and rendered a decision on 1 April 2011 ordering the opponent party to pay for our client’s legal costs.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented an appellant’s opponent party in a civil dispute regarding international consumer sale of goods in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 5\/2009-3\/2011: the judgment on 28 March 2011, whereby our client’s claims succeeded in full and the appellant’s appeal was dismissed and the legal costs of our client shall mostly be paid by the opponent party.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Representing a claimant Finnish limited liability company in a compensation matter regarding the infringement of the employment agreement in the District Court of Helsinki, 3\/2011-.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a retail trade limited liability company in drafting a shareholders’ agreement, 3\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company in drafting an air cargo supply agreement with the company from Russia, 3\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Advising a shareholder of the limited liability company in a termination of the shareholder’s agreement, 2\/2011-.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex succesfully represented a Finnish import and wholesale limited liability company in a dealer agreement dispute, 2\/2011: our client’s opponent party withdrew its claims.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex succesfully represented a defendant Finnish limited liability company in a dispute regarding claims for damages, 2\/2011: our client’s opponent party withdrew its claims.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a respondent Finnish limited liability company in a contractual dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 1\/2011-2\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our client.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a buyer of share in a housing company in precontract dispute, 1\/2011-2\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our client.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a personnel lease company in an employment disagreement in the District court of Helsinki, 10\/2010- 2\/2011: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client 11 February 2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a Finnish carrier limited liability company as appellant’s opponent party in the termination of an employment agreement dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 7\/2010-2\/2011: the judgment on 8 February 2011, whereby our client’s claims succeeded and the appellant’s appeal was mainly dismissed and the legal costs of our client shall mostly be paid by the opponent party.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a Finnish limited liability company in a disagreement regarding a letter of intent contract, 10\/2010-2\/2011: our client’s opponent party withdrew its claims.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a housing corporation claimant in a housing corporation related dispute in the District Court of Espoo, 12\/2008-1\/2011: the District Court of Espoo confirmed a settlement on 26 January 2011 whereby the opponent party undertook to pay all our client’s claims on the merits and legal costs with due interest in full.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a consultant in a consultancy fee dispute in the Supreme Court of Finland, 7\/2009-1\/2011: the case resulted in a precedent issued by the Supreme Court of Finland.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish security business company in drafting a shareholders’ agreement, 1\/2011.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of majority shareholders of a Finnish limited liability company in directed share issue arrangements, 11\/2010-1\/2011.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"class_list":["post-4482","referenssi","type-referenssi","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/referenssi\/4482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/referenssi"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/referenssi"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}