{"id":4481,"date":"2019-05-17T05:56:08","date_gmt":"2019-05-17T02:56:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/referenssi\/2010\/"},"modified":"2019-05-17T05:56:08","modified_gmt":"2019-05-17T02:56:08","slug":"2010","status":"publish","type":"referenssi","link":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/","title":{"rendered":"2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a limited liability company as appellant&#8217;s opponent party in a contract dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 8\/2009-12\/2010: the judgment on 31 December 2010, whereby our client&#8217;s claims succeeded partly and the opponent party was obligated to pay compensations to our client under the contract.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented an appellant&#8217;s opponent party in the enforcement of an ad hoc arbitral award in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 5\/2009-12\/2010: the judgment on 28 December 2010, whereby appellant&#8217;s appeal was dismissed and our client&#8217;s enforcement claim was confirmed and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent party.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Representing a claimant transport company in a subcontract related dispute in the District Court of Kymenlaakso, 12\/2010-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented an IT business limited liability company in civil dispute regarding appeal against judgment by default in the District Court of Helsinki, 11\/2010-12\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation on 15 December 2010 in favour of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a defendant limited liability company in a civil dispute regarding sale of goods in the District Court of Helsinki, 5\/2010-12\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation on 15 December 2010 in favour of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a defendant limited liability company in a civil dispute regarding sale of goods in the District Court of Helsinki, 1\/2010-12\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation on 10 December 2010 in favour of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Representing a Finnish limited liability company in an IPR related disagreement matter, 12\/2010-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Representing a claimant in a consultancy fee dispute in the District Court of Etel\u00e4-Pohjanmaa, 12\/2010-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised an IT business limited liability company in drafting service co-operation agreements, 11\/2010-12\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a radiology industry limited liability company in drafting service co-operation agreements with private clinics, 11\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a managing director and a member of the board of directors of a Finnish carrier limited liability company in criminal procedure regarding alleged work time violation in the District Court of Helsinki, 11\/2010: the judgment 4 November 2010, whereby the prosecutor&#8217;s charge was dismissed and our client&#8217;s legal costs were awarded to cover by the state.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a vehicle sales limited liability company in the lease business premises debt collection, termination of the lease agreement and eviction of the lease premises, 10\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a leading Finnish bicycles importer and wholesale limited liability company in drafting a subcontract agreement, 10\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Representing a defendant in a large white collar criminal procedure regarding a gross fault accounting in the District Court of Helsinki, 10\/2010-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish promotion agent office limited liability company in drafting co-operation agreement 10\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented an IT business company in a company name infringement matter, 10\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a company in an employment disagreement in the District court of Vantaa 6\/2010-11\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client on 12 October 2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish import and wholesale limited liability company in drafting an international distribution agreement with the company from the U.S., 10\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish limited liability company as a principal in drafting an international consultancy agreement, 10\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of majority shareholders of a Finnish limited liability company in drafting a shareholder&#8217;s agreement 10\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a defendant limited liability company in a lease agreement dispute in the District Court of Hyvink\u00e4\u00e4, 12\/2009-10\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our client for which the District Court confirmed by its decision on 6 October 2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel in M&amp;A transaction: in drafting amendments of the articles of association and the separate series of shares as well as follow through share issues arrangements, 9\/2010-10\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised one of the leading international chemical industry companies in drafting the lease agreements, 9\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of the employer limited liability company in a procedure relating to employee&#8217;s dismissal of the employment, 9\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a shareholder of a limited liability company in termination of the managing director&#8217;s agreement and share redemption disagreement, 9\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a contractor limited liability company in a procedure regarding a safety at work in the District Court of Helsinki, 3\/2010-8\/2010: the judgment on 31 August 2010, the prosecutor&#8217;s charges were dismissed and our client&#8217;s legal costs were covered by the state in full.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a contractor limited liability company in building contract dispute in the District Court of L\u00e4nsi-Uusimaa, 8\/2009-8\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our client on 27 August 2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented an employee in employment termination dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 5\/2009-8\/2010: the judgment on 10 August 2010, whereby our client&#8217;s claims succeeded and the opponent party was obligated to pay compensations to our client for unjustifiable employment termination.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish clothing agency limited liability company in drafting the lease agreement, 8\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented an employee as appellant&#8217;s opponent party in employment termination dispute in the Kouvola Court of Appeals, 2\/2010-7\/2010: the judgment 7 July 2010, whereby our client&#8217;s claims succeeded partly and the opponent party was obligated to pay compensations to our client for unjustifiable employment termination.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented several (13) buyers of a housing trade as appellant&#8217;s opponent party in a civil dispute regarding a financial fault of the housing trade in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 1\/2010-7\/2010: the judgment 2 July 2010, whereby appellant&#8217;s appeal was dismissed and our clients&#8217; claim for price reduction was confirmed and the legal costs of our clients shall be fully paid by the opponent party.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Representing a Finnish carrier limited liability company as appellant&#8217;s opponent party in termination of an employment agreement dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 7\/2010-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel in directed share issue arrangement as well as in drafting shareholders&#8217; agreement and amendments of the articles of association, 6\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a Finnish selling limited liability company in drafting sales representative agreement with a Mexican corporation, 6\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a majority shareholder and a limited liability company in drafting shareholders&#8217; agreement, 6\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a department store merchant in employment disagreement, 3\/2010-6\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented the sellers in a dispute regarding a housing trade, 5\/2010-6\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favor of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a bankruptcy trustee regarding the bankruptcy of the management consultancy company, 3\/2010-6\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented successfully the sellers in real estate business dispute, 1\/2010-5\/2010: the opponent party dismissed all its claims against our clients.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Representing an employee in employment termination dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 5\/2010-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish Freight Watchers company in co-operation contract disagreements, 4\/2010-5\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a claimant in claim for damages against a housing company in the District Court of Helsinki, 10\/2008-5\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of the employer limited liability company in procedure relating to dismissal of employment, 4\/2010-5\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a clothing import and wholesale limited liability company in contractual arrangement regarding the international distribution agreement, 4\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a defendant contractor limited liability company in a cooperation agreement dispute in the District Court of L\u00e4nsi-Uusimaa, 1\/2010-4\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation 14 April 2010 in favour of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Representing a Finnish construction and mechanical business limited liability company in insolvency related dispute in the District Court of Pirkanmaa, 4\/2010-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a registered association as a claimant in a contract disagreement in the District Court of Helsinki, 8\/2009-4\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation 1 April 2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented successfully a housing corporation as a builder in a building contract disagreement relating to the General Conditions for Building Contracts (YSE 1998) in the District Court of Helsinki, 12\/2008-3\/2010: the judgment 30 March 2010, whereby our client&#8217;s claim for price reduction was accepted and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent party in fully.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Representing a limited liability company in shareholder&#8217;s exit, 3\/2010-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of the Finnish limited liability company in company law related arrangements: executing a share issue without payments and against payments as well as in drafting and enforcing different share classes and amendments of the articles of association, 3\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a Finnish carrier limited liability company as a respondent in termination of an employment agreement dispute in the District Court of Vantaa, 12\/2008-3\/2010: the judgment 15 March 2010, whereby our client&#8217;s rebuttal claims were accepted and the legal costs of our client shall be paid by the opponent party in full.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of the Finnish limited liability companies in procedures relating to 4 MEUR share acquisition arrangements and 5 MEUR guarantee and debt arrangements, 3\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a defendant company in an employment termination dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 3\/2009-3\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation 5 March 2010 in favour of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a claimant in a civil dispute regarding sale of goods in the District Court of Pohjois-Savo, 8\/2009-3\/2010: the judgment 3 March 2010, whereby our client&#8217;s claims were accepted and the legal costs of our client shall be mostly paid by the defendant.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a leading Finnish sports club limited liability company in employment matters, 3\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a contractor limited liability company in renovation contract dispute in the District Court of Tuusula, 12\/2009-2\/2010 the matter was closed by amicable negotiation 24 February 2010 in favour of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a French winery company on Finnish market selling protection matters, 2\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a leading international freight forwarding and logistics limited liability company in employment arrangements, 2\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Representing a claimant in service agreement reimbursement dispute in the District Court of Helsinki wherein the opponent party is a listed Finnish public company, 2\/2010-.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented claimants in a dispute regarding a housing trade in the District Court of Helsinki, 1\/2009-2\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our clients when the opponent party real estate agent company undertook to pay amicable payment to our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a food industry limited liability company in M&amp;A transaction in drafting a share purchase agreement and shareholders&#8217; agreement as well as executing corporate resolutions, 2\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex advised a food industry limited liability company in drafting an agent agreement, 2\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a defendant limited liability company in contract dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 10\/2009-2\/2010: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation 1 February 2010 in favour of our client.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a claimant in insurance compensation dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 3\/2009-1\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of the employer limited liability company in procedure relating to dismissal of the employment, 1\/2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish wholesale and retail limited liability company in drafting its contractual terms, 1\/2010.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"class_list":["post-4481","referenssi","type-referenssi","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.0.1 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"\u2022 Ratiolex represented a limited liability company as appellant&#039;s opponent party in a contract dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 8\/2009-12\/2010: the judgment on 31 December 2010, whereby our client&#039;s claims succeeded partly and the opponent party was obligated to pay compensations to our client under the contract. \u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented an appellant&#039;s\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"google-site-verification\" content=\"Oeiw2WfmAaOKRLjTlNEWNfvvzy0dLZt-SQ3PuCoiHoc\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.0.1\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Asianajotoimisto Ratiolex Oy -\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2010 - Asianajotoimisto Ratiolex Oy\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u2022 Ratiolex represented a limited liability company as appellant&#039;s opponent party in a contract dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 8\/2009-12\/2010: the judgment on 31 December 2010, whereby our client&#039;s claims succeeded partly and the opponent party was obligated to pay compensations to our client under the contract. \u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented an appellant&#039;s\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/ratiolex-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:secure_url\" content=\"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/ratiolex-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1440\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"656\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-17T02:56:08+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-17T02:56:08+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2010 - Asianajotoimisto Ratiolex Oy\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"\u2022 Ratiolex represented a limited liability company as appellant&#039;s opponent party in a contract dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 8\/2009-12\/2010: the judgment on 31 December 2010, whereby our client&#039;s claims succeeded partly and the opponent party was obligated to pay compensations to our client under the contract. \u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented an appellant&#039;s\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/ratiolex-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/referenssi\\\/2010\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/referenssi\\\/2010\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"2010\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/referenssi\\\/2010\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2010\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Luotsi-teema\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/referenssi\\\/2010\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/referenssi\\\/2010\\\/\",\"name\":\"2010 - Asianajotoimisto Ratiolex Oy\",\"description\":\"\\u2022 Ratiolex represented a limited liability company as appellant's opponent party in a contract dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 8\\\/2009-12\\\/2010: the judgment on 31 December 2010, whereby our client's claims succeeded partly and the opponent party was obligated to pay compensations to our client under the contract. \\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented an appellant's\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/referenssi\\\/2010\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-17T05:56:08+03:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-17T05:56:08+03:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Luotsi-teema\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ratiolex.fi\\\/en\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"2010 - Asianajotoimisto Ratiolex Oy","description":"\u2022 Ratiolex represented a limited liability company as appellant's opponent party in a contract dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 8\/2009-12\/2010: the judgment on 31 December 2010, whereby our client's claims succeeded partly and the opponent party was obligated to pay compensations to our client under the contract. \u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented an appellant's","canonical_url":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"google-site-verification":"Oeiw2WfmAaOKRLjTlNEWNfvvzy0dLZt-SQ3PuCoiHoc","miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/#listItem","name":"2010"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"2010","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/#listItem","name":"Home"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/#organization","name":"Luotsi-teema","url":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/","name":"2010 - Asianajotoimisto Ratiolex Oy","description":"\u2022 Ratiolex represented a limited liability company as appellant's opponent party in a contract dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 8\/2009-12\/2010: the judgment on 31 December 2010, whereby our client's claims succeeded partly and the opponent party was obligated to pay compensations to our client under the contract. \u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented an appellant's","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/#breadcrumblist"},"datePublished":"2019-05-17T05:56:08+03:00","dateModified":"2019-05-17T05:56:08+03:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/","name":"Luotsi-teema","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Asianajotoimisto Ratiolex Oy -","og:type":"article","og:title":"2010 - Asianajotoimisto Ratiolex Oy","og:description":"\u2022 Ratiolex represented a limited liability company as appellant's opponent party in a contract dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 8\/2009-12\/2010: the judgment on 31 December 2010, whereby our client's claims succeeded partly and the opponent party was obligated to pay compensations to our client under the contract. \u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented an appellant's","og:url":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/","og:image":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/ratiolex-3.jpg","og:image:secure_url":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/ratiolex-3.jpg","og:image:width":1440,"og:image:height":656,"article:published_time":"2019-05-17T02:56:08+00:00","article:modified_time":"2019-05-17T02:56:08+00:00","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"2010 - Asianajotoimisto Ratiolex Oy","twitter:description":"\u2022 Ratiolex represented a limited liability company as appellant's opponent party in a contract dispute in the Helsinki Court of Appeals, 8\/2009-12\/2010: the judgment on 31 December 2010, whereby our client's claims succeeded partly and the opponent party was obligated to pay compensations to our client under the contract. \u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented an appellant's","twitter:image":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/ratiolex-3.jpg"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"4481","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"ai":null,"created":"2025-01-30 08:55:07","updated":"2025-06-04 06:08:03","seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t2010\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/"},{"label":"2010","link":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/referenssi\/2010\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/referenssi\/4481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/referenssi"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/referenssi"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}