\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a defendant in a large white collar criminal procedure regarding a large scale fraud by front companies in the District Court of Helsinki, 12\/2005-11\/2006: the judgment became valid 27 December 2006, the prosecutor’s prison charges relating to our client were dismissed and party and legal costs were covered by the state.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented an international construction company in a building contract dispute, 12\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented an international VOIP tele-operator company in drafting its contractual terms, 11\/2006-12\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a leading Finnish importer and retailer company of tires and rims as well as another defendant company in a civil dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 5\/2006-11\/2006: the judgment became valid 28 November 2006, all claimant’s claims were dismissed and all party and legal costs of our clients’ companies shall be paid by the claimant company in full.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a defendant in a criminal procedure in the District Court of Kuusamo, 11\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a plaintiff in a criminal procedure in the District Court of Helsinki regarding the case of robbery, 1\/2006-11\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex drafted general purchase and order contractual terms for a leading Finnish merchandising and logistics company, 10\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a Finnish freight watchers company in a civil dispute in the District Court of Vantaa, 9\/2006-10\/2006: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our client.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented many plaintiffs in a criminal procedure in the District Court of Helsinki regarding the suit and dress fraud case which appeared in publicity, 1\/2006-10\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel for a Finnish limited liability company and a British limited liability company by negotiating and tailoring a financing arrangement and a share purchase, 9\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a contractor in a building contract dispute, 9\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented claimants in a civil dispute procedure in the District Court of Espoo regarding a housing trade, 4\/2006-9\/2006: the matter was closed 9\/2006 by amicable negotiation whereby our clients were awarded 73.5 % of the claimed amount\/sum.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex drafted employment agreement templates and advised on labor issues a tires retailer company, 9\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel of the buyer candidates in purchase of shares of the tires retailer company, 8\/2006: drafted the share purchase agreements, drafted and executed corporate resolutions, drafted a shareholders’ agreement.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a defendant in a criminal procedure in the District Court of Helsinki, 8\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex drafted general contractual terms for a personal computer support service limited liability company, 8\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a defendant company in renting of a business dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 7\/2006-8\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a claimant in a housing lease dispute in the District Court of Helsinki, 6\/2006-7\/2006: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation according to our client’s claims.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex drafted a Supply Framework Agreement in English to a leading Finnish merchandising and logistics company for the purposes of trade in Eastern European countries, 6\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex served as a legal advisor of an international mobile entertainment service company in M&A transaction, 5\/2006-6\/2006: conducted due diligence examinations, negotiated and drafted acquisition documents.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a claimant in a franchising dispute case, 2\/2006-6\/2006: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation in favour of our client.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented an entertainment company in a trademark issue, 5\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a plaintiff in a criminal procedure in the District Court of Helsinki regarding a claim for damages, 5\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a leading Finnish motor sport events company in the District Court of Vantaa regarding a claim for damages, 4\/2006-5\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex drafted employment agreement templates for a Finnish freight watchers company, 4\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented an international mobile entertainment service company in drafting a managing director agreement in English, 4\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a private individual in a large tax advisement case, 3\/2006-4\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented a claimant in a civil procedure in the District Court of Helsinki regarding a matter of housing lease, 2\/2006-4\/2006: the matter was closed by amicable negotiation whereby our client was awarded 80 % of the claimed amount\/sum.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel in M&A transactions regarding the restaurant companies, 2\/2006-3\/2006: accomplished a limited due diligence, drafted the business trade and financial documents and applied all necessary licensees from authorities.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex acted as a legal counsel in drafting issues of the share purchase agreement, shareholders’ agreement and director’s agreement, 2\/2006: assignment issued by the leading Finnish housing lease and investment company.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented plaintiffs in a complaint offence and action for damages in a criminal procedure in the District Court of Helsinki, 2\/2006.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex successfully represented a defendant in a large criminal procedure in the District Court of Hyvink\u00e4\u00e4, 1\/2006-2\/2006: the judgment became valid 7 February 2006, the entire prosecutor’s prison charges and all on the behalf of plaintiff’s civil claims were dismissed and all party and legal costs were covered by the state in full.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Ratiolex represented in a administrative procedure in state Provisional Office of southern Finland and in a related criminal procedure, 1\/2006.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"class_list":["post-4477","referenssi","type-referenssi","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/referenssi\/4477","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/referenssi"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/referenssi"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratiolex.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}